home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu.tar
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
icon
/
newsgrp
/
group94b.txt
/
000006_icon-group-sender _Fri Aug 19 17:49:25 1994.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-02-09
|
788b
Received: by cheltenham.cs.arizona.edu; Fri, 19 Aug 1994 08:57:31 MST
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 1994 17:49:25 +0300 (WET)
From: Zvi Lamm <mslamm@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il>
Subject: Simple synatx
To: icon-group@cs.arizona.edu
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.1.2.9408191703.C45477-0100000@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: icon-group-errors@cs.arizona.edu
I was thinking about a mechanical way to decide between to synatxes which
one is simpler. The idea is to make the definition as precise as
possible, and see what we can learn.
Do you think this is at all possible? What bothers me is the differance
between the way a computer parses and the way people do. This raises the
question - simple synatx for whom?
*Ehud Lamm*